• Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Feeds
  • Glossary
  • Contact
Tours In Space
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
No Result
View All Result
Tours In Space
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

NASA seeks faster, more affordable Mars sample return mission

Ensign by Ensign
June 5, 2024
in Uncategorized
0
NASA Releases Independent Review’s Mars Sample Return Report
191
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

NASA seeks faster, more affordable Mars sample return mission

by Mike Heuer

Space Coast FL (SPX) Jun 05, 2024




NASA officials want a new Mars sample return mission plan that is faster, costs less and isn’t as complex than one scrapped in April.

The space agency doesn’t want to wait until 2040 and spend $11 billion to return core samples being collected on Mars, which the recently scrapped plan would have required.
NASA Administrator Bill Nelson in April canceled the lengthy mission plan, saying he wants to see collaboration on a less-pricey mission design that also reduces complexity and risk.

“The bottom line is, an $11 billion budget is too expensive and a 2040 return date is too far away,” Nelson said in an April 15 news release. He said he wants a new plan that will accomplish the mission in the 2030s.

Nelson said safely landing a spacecraft on Mars, collecting the samples and launching a rocket containing the samples off another plant never has been done. The Perseverance rover has collected rock samples, but that’s where the process ends for now.

“We need to look outside the box to find a way ahead that is both affordable and returns samples in a reasonable time frame,” he said.

If the sample collection and return launch from Mars are successful, the spacecraft would have to travel more than 33 million miles to Earth, which Nelson said is “no small task.”

“The Mars sample return mission is one of the most complex science missions NASA has ever attempted,” NASA officials told UPI in an email.

“NASA intends to hold Mars sample return costs to no more than 35% of the annual budget for the Planetary Science Division,” space agency officials said. NASA allocated $310 million for its 2024 Mars sample return budget and seeks $200 million for 2025.

NASA officials want an updated mission design with a total budget closer to $8 billion, and on April 16 issued a request for proposals from industry, NASA centers and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that leverage innovation and proven technologies.

Nelson said he wanted an alternate plan by fall.

The original plan relied on the European Space Agency’s Earth return orbiter and the agency’s capture containment and return system. It also included contributions from Lockheed Martin.

That contractor was to have received $35 million for the Mars lander’s cruise stage, $194 million for a Mars ascent vehicle and $2.6 million to design an Earth entry system.

It’s unknown if the new plan would include Lockheed Martin contributions.

As with many space projects, the projected cost has risen sharply from that initial estimate of $5.3 billion. That amount proved to be only about half the revised $11 billion cost estimate to retrieve samples gathered by Perseverance.

George Scott, acting inspector general of NASA, identified several problems with the initial $5.3 billion cost estimate in testimony before the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics on March 21.

The initial budget, he said, anticipated 2% inflation when the idea was developed in 2020 to late 2021, but actual inflation rates ranged from 5% to 9% from late 2021 to early 2023. Also, a sample-receiving facility — and its cost — wasn’t included.

Moreover, the European Space Agency didn’t provide the mission a sample fetch rover it promised, so NASA planned to replaced that with sample recovery helicopters at considerable cost.

Also, the $5.3 billion funding estimate was only is for costs incurred from 2023 to 2032 and not the program’s entire life cycle.

Scott referred to a 2020 Science Mission Directorate report that notes NASA’s early cost estimates commonly have a high degree of precision but poor accuracy.

It says precise but inaccurate cost estimates create a “false sense of confidence in early numbers and timelines, leading stakeholders to latch onto these inaccurate preliminary estimates.”

False confidence in inaccurate estimates “can unrealistically constrain the project in later phases,” according to the report.

NASA’s sent Perseverance to Mars in 2020, and it started collecting samples in 2021. It continues exploratory drilling of core samples. that need eventual collection.

The rover has collected 38 samples that are stored in tubes, which represents about two-thirds of its sample-collecting capability, NASA noted.

Returning those samples from Mars is a “key priority,” said Nicola “Nicky” Fox, associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.

“Our next steps will position us to bring this transformational mission forward and deliver revolutionary science from Mars,” Fox said in an April 15 news release.

The samples should provide “critical new insights into the origins and evolution of Mars, our solar system and life on Earth,” she added.

If a new plan is developed, travel to Mars, collecting the samples and returning would take a year to two years, depending on the propulsion system used, officials have said.

NASA anticipates having a viable plan by the end of the year.

Source: United Press International

Related Links

Mars Sample Return

Mars News and Information at MarsDaily.com
Lunar Dreams and more

Tags: MarsNASAPerseverance Rover
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • The lunar mining gold rush is coming – and success requires bridging two worlds 
  • Vantor satellites track space objects in ‘blind spots’ inaccessible to military ground sensors
  • Satellites watch glaciers melting in Patagonia | Space photo of the day for Oct. 22, 2025
  • Musk criticizes Duffy amid NASA leadership debate
  • Volcanic explosions on Mars may have left massive ice deposits at the Red Planet’s equator

Categories

  • Excursions
  • Kepler Mission
  • NASA
  • NASA Breaking News
  • Physical Preparation
  • Preparation
  • Space News
  • Space Station News
  • Spacewalks
  • Tours
  • Uncategorized
  • Weightlessness Training
  • What Not to Pack
  • What to Pack

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Preparing for Your Trip
  • Space Tourism Companies
  • Space Tours
  • Contact

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Contact
  • Feeds
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Privacy Policy
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
  • Start Here
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Tours in Space is your launchpad to the world of space tourism

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.