• Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Feeds
  • Glossary
  • Contact
Tours In Space
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
No Result
View All Result
Tours In Space
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

‘Space Armor’ to challenge traditional metal shielding on satellites

Ensign by Ensign
October 17, 2025
in Uncategorized
0
‘Space Armor’ to challenge traditional metal shielding on satellites
189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
image

WASHINGTON — Atomic-6, a composite materials manufacturer based in Marietta, Georgia, believes it has found a lighter, more resilient alternative to traditional satellite shielding. Following successful lab tests of its “Space Armor” shielding that protects spacecraft from debris impact, the company is preparing to demonstrate it in orbit and start producing it for the U.S. Space Force and other organizations.

The development of the Space Armor technology was funded by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force under a $1.2 million Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase 2 award and a $3.8 million Tactical Funding Increase (TACFI) agreement that includes private matching funds.

Rethinking a 1940s invention

The market is looking for a new type of debris shield as the technology hasn’t changed much since the so-called “Whipple shield” was introduced in the 1940s by astronomer Fred Whipple, said Atomic-6 CEO Trevor Smith.

Most shielding used today is effective but the government and many commercial firms are interested in alternatives, Smith told <em>SpaceNews.

The goal of the SBIR contract is to advance protective shielding technology that protects satellites from debris impacts without interfering with radio-frequency communications — resisting impact while allowing radio communications to and from the satellite it’s protecting.

Access all of SpaceNews’ reporting and analysis from $5/week. Subscribe today.

Smith said Space Armor is lighter and thinner than the Whipple shield, though the product has not yet completed flight tests.

The company has developed two product variants: Space Armor Lite, designed to stop particles up to 3 mm in diameter, and Space Armor Max, engineered to withstand impacts from debris up to 12.5 mm in diameter.

The Space Armor hexagonal tiles are less than an inch thick. The tiles can be attached to spacecraft surfaces to protect critical components. According to Smith, the Space Armor Lite tiles are “about 30% lighter and 15% thinner than the Whipple aluminum shields.”

The company conducted hypervelocity impact testing at the University of Dayton Research Institute and Texas A&M University, firing 3 mm aluminum projectiles at speeds over 7 kilometers per second — roughly orbital velocity.

The results, Smith said, demonstrated that Space Armor tiles are fragmentation resistant — they absorb and contain debris impacts rather than creating secondary fragments that could endanger other satellites.

Flight qualification is forthcoming, said Smith. “We do have a verbal offer to fly with a customer next year.”

Avoid creating more debris

Orbital debris remains one of the defining hazards of space operations. Millions of untrackable fragments smaller than a centimeter zip around low Earth orbit at speeds exceeding 7 km per second — fast enough to puncture fuel tanks or tear through a spacesuit. 

The promise of a modular, lighter system that resists fragmentation could be appealing to both the military and the commercial space industry, Smith said.

Atomic-6 is also experimenting with curved Space Armor structures for potential use in astronaut suits. The shielding is also being looked at by defense contractors for use in ground combat vehicles. “This, in theory, should protect from lasers trying to blind a comms device,” Smith said.

Smith declined to discuss pricing but said satellite insurers have shown interest. During a recent trip to meet with underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, he said they told him that “once Space Armor is flight qualified, they would consider offering a discount to their customers if they’re flying the products, because they see it as such a risk mitigant.”

Because Space Armor was developed under an SBIR contract, Atomic-6 retains data rights to the technology — an important advantage as it prepares for commercialization.

Lighter solar panels

The Space Armor program isn’t Atomic-6’s only Space Force-funded project. Under a separate $2 million TACFI agreement, the company is developing Light Wing, a solar array designed to stow and redeploy.

“Our solar array is going through flight qualification as well,” Smith said. An early version is scheduled to fly in February 2026. “That will buy down risk,” he added, as the company completes a one-kilowatt, fully deployable version for a later mission.

The array design seeks to minimize the number of moving parts to reduce deployment failures. “And because it’s retractable and redeployable, if you have any issues on deployment, you can simply retract it and then try to deploy again,” Smith said.

Smith said Atomic-6 is laying out plans to build a production facility for both Space Armor and Light Wing to start manufacturing after the products are qualified.

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Taiwan should build a space-enabled kill web, not big warships
  • ‘You’re free!’ Tiny Japanese satellites escape doomed space station years ahead of its fiery death | Space photo of the day for Oct. 21, 2025
  • Orion installed on SLS as Artemis 2 preparations continue during shutdown
  • Starlink mini lasers to link Muon Space satellites for near real-time connectivity
  • This company’s plan to launch 4,000 massive space mirrors has scientists alarmed: ‘From an astronomical perspective, that’s pretty catastrophic’

Categories

  • Excursions
  • Kepler Mission
  • NASA
  • NASA Breaking News
  • Physical Preparation
  • Preparation
  • Space News
  • Space Station News
  • Spacewalks
  • Tours
  • Uncategorized
  • Weightlessness Training
  • What Not to Pack
  • What to Pack

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Preparing for Your Trip
  • Space Tourism Companies
  • Space Tours
  • Contact

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Contact
  • Feeds
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Preparing for Your Trip
    • Insurance and Legal Waivers
    • Physical and Medical Requirements
    • Training Programs
    • What to Expect
  • Privacy Policy
  • Space Tourism Companies
    • Axiom Space
    • Blue Origin
    • Blue Origin vs Virgin Galactic
    • Comparison Chart: Features, Pricing, Booking
    • SpaceX
    • Virgin Galactic
    • World View (stratospheric balloon flights)
  • Space Tours
    • Custom & Luxury Packages
    • Duration, Training, Costs
    • Experiences
    • Future Moon/Mars Options
    • Orbital Flights
    • Parabolic Flight Experiences
    • Private Missions
    • Stratospheric Balloon Flights
    • Suborbital Flights
    • Zero-Gravity Flights
  • Spaceflight Technologies
    • Space Tourism Balloon
  • Start Here
    • How to Book a Space Tour
    • Intro to Commercial Spaceflight
    • Is Space Tourism Safe?
    • Space Travel FAQs
    • View Earth from the Edge
    • What to Pack
  • Tours in Space is your launchpad to the world of space tourism

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.